Monday, 13 April 2015

Giant Lizards on High: Blurt in the Quietus


Little feature with Ted Milton of Blurt at The Quietus. Blurt will be performing with Graham Dunning & Colin Webster plus Far Rainbow at the Fiddler’s Elbow, Camden, on April 21st. Declare your attendance here.

Thursday, 19 June 2014

The Future… starts this Saturday on Haggerston Radio

Image courtesy Sheroes tumblr

Welcome to The Future. The year is 2359. We are broadcasting from the basement archives of the former State Institute for Futurology. For the next two hours we will be sifting through the ruins of yesterday’s dreams for tomorrow. Everything is in disarray. The filing system is corrupted. But somehow, somewhere amongst the dust and the rubble we will – we will – we – w –


Haggerston Radio. This Saturday, the 21st of June. 18:00 – 20:00.








Still Life (Betamale), Jon Rafman + Oneohtrix Point Never, 2013 from jonrafman on Vimeo.


Piercing Brightness (extract) from The Wire Magazine on Vimeo.

Friday, 30 May 2014

Border Patrol: Eva Fàbregas at Kunstraum


A bright pink t-shaped lump of styrofoam has got stuck. It stutters uselessly, shunting back and forth against the feet of a desk. It’ll need a helping hand to get on its way again. “Some of them are more intelligent than others,” the woman occupying that desk informs me with a sigh as she picks up the plucky wedge and turns it around, setting it merrily scuttling forth across the floor once again.

Untitled (2014), a work by Barcelona-born artist Eva Fàbregas, sees a small hive of mysteriously animated chunks of packing material loosed upon the floor of the Kunstraum in Hoxton. Concealed within each brightly coloured hulk are miniature sensors and ambulating motors, giving each one an uncanny sense of robotic autonomy.

For all their perky, gaily-coloured cuteness, there is something faintly terrifying about Fabregas’s styrobots. We have spent so long disregarding this stuff, packing foam. It’s everywhere. What if it were to rise up and take over, like kipple? “No one can win against kipple,” as Philip K. Dick warned in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.

“Kipple is useless objects, like junk mail or match folders after you use the last match or gum wrappers or yesterday’s homeopape. When nobody’s around kipple reproduces itself. … Eventually everything within the building would merge, would be faceless and identical, mere pudding-like kipple piled to the ceiling of each apartment. And, after that, the uncared-for building itself would settle into shapelessness, buried under the ubiquity of dust.” 
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep

Of course, this stuff, this styrofoam, this kipple, already is moving, and was moving, long before Eva Fàbregas came along. Hardly anything on earth is more mobile. It is the hidden remainder of modern capitalism. Hidden, that is, in plain sight; rendered oblique by sheer ubiquity.

Coupled here with works by British artist Andrew Lacon – which see a photocopy of a photocopy of a photograph of the folds of the skirts of Saint Theresa (from Bernini’s famous Ecstasy of…) re-coloured by the red, blue, and green gels placed over the gallery skylights, their uncertain hues shifting with the time of day – Fàbregas’s autonomous packing bots raise a question of framing, of the surround that shapes the content we perceive and consume.

People sometimes moan about ‘style over content’, but what is content without form? It’s kipple, that’s what. Just kipple.


Saturday, 24 May 2014

Music + Moog = Control


“Because the Buchla and the Moog opened up the possibilities of controlling sound across its entire spectrum in so many diverse ways,” synth pioneer Bernie Krause explained to me via Skype, “– well, for me, it changed the whole idea of music.

“There are a lot of definitions of music. But for Paul [Beaver] and me, when we wrote the Nonesuch Guide to Electronic Music, we were asked at that time to define what music was. And it was very clear, with the synthesizer, that music was control of sound and that made the change for us. We then understood what it was. Finally.”

I spoke to Bernie Krause, former west coast dealer to the R.A. Moog Co. and synthesizer consultant to groups such as The Monkees, The Doors, and The Byrds, for this article at The Quietus, The Stradivarius of the Synthesizer: Fifty Years of the Moog. You can also hear me chatting about the Moog on Tom Robinson’s 6Music show this Sunday evening, Now Playing, between 18:00 and 20:00.


Tuesday, 20 May 2014

Pioneer of the Stars: The Bad Angel’s Early Career

 

The above song, a hit for the Ohio-born Wilson in 1968, was written by a then 55 year-old Frank Stanton with a much younger man going by the name of Andy Badale.

At the same time, this Badale was also working with ondioline maestro Jean-Jacques Perrey, co-writing and producing large chunks of Perrey’s two solo albums for Vanguard, The Amazing New Electronic Pop Sound and Moog Indigo. Earlier, Badale was credited as co-composer on two Perrey & Kingsley tracks, ‘Visa to the Stars’ (from The In Sound From Way Out) and ‘Pioneers of the Stars’ (on Kaleidoscopic Vibrations).



After that, however, Badale’s trail starts to go a little cold. He wrote a few songs for Shirley Bassey, and for the Ossie Davis movie Howard’s War, and even wrote all the backing music for this children’s story.



But that was not the end of Badale’s career. Far from it. For you can see Badale playing the piano 7 minutes and 53 seconds into the following clip, having been offered the part by the film’s director after being hired as a vocal coach to the film’s Italian star.


By this time, Badale had started using the name he was born with, Angelo Badalamenti, and with that name, of course, he went on to work on many more films, notably with David Lynch.

Monday, 12 May 2014

None More Black: Andrew Chugg's Radio Documentary on Black Midi


A radio documentary on Black Midi by Andrew Chugg for PRX in which I manage to quote Spinal Tap. Also, I think at the beginning I sound (appropriately perhaps) rather like a robot.

Friday, 9 May 2014

In Praise of Ukip Poster Vandals

“As I strolled along Heath Mill Lane towards Eastside Projects, I was confronted with a billboard that offended me in so many ways … that billboard in Heath Mill Lane that was very cynically trying to pander to us at our most vulnerable and negative and not to our better selves … This billboard not only offended me morally and aesthetically it also went against everything that I feel political discourse should be about.

“Thus there was nothing for it, after my train pulled into Moor Street, I picked up my last remaining tins of Drummond’s International Grey and got to work.”

– Bill Drummond, writing in The Birmingham Post

Before

After
Nor is Drummond alone. As Glaswegian rapper tom dissonance recently posted on Twitter, Ukip are “certainly showing that grassroots art vandalism is alive and well in this country.”

A dedicated Tumblr blog, Destroyed Ukip Billboards, has even sprung up to exhibit the best examples.

I have a soft spot for this Stezaker-esque collage, which seems to transform Farage’s party’s simple-minded far-right populism into an obscure metaphysical enquiry…



Keep up the good work.

Wednesday, 7 May 2014

Next Level Shits and Giggles: Harmony Korine on Fight Harm



“I was messed up in the head at the time. I thought I was going to make the great American comedy, that I was going to reinvent comedy, and I wanted to pick up from where I saw Buster Keaton or WC Fields. I wanted to isolate this idea of violence and the repetition of violence and how it would become humorous. Y’know,  a guy slips on a banana peel and hits his head, or falls down some stairs, or hangs off of a clock tower, and there was something humorous in this. I was trying to figure it out. 

“So I thought the purest, truest humour would be to just have a series of brutal fights, where I would just lose the fight. But I would fight every single demographic. So, like on wednesday I’d fight a lesbian, on tuesday I’d fight a Greek guy… you know what I’m saying? To just go through the entire demographic of people that constituted New York City at the time. 

“But after maybe five fights I realised that I wasn’t gonna be able to hang on.” 


But with Chaplin and Keaton, part of what makes it funny is that you know they’ll be alright…

“Right, but like I said, I felt like it was the next [level]. I felt like it was the evolution. Where you actually knew that the person was not gonna be alright. 

“I don’t know how funny it is, but at the time it seemed like that was the most obvious place to go.”


What did your friends and family say about this project?

 “They were very concerned.”


– Harmony Korine discussing his abandoned project Fight Harm (from this 2010 interview for The Quietus)

Friday, 2 May 2014

“What’s more irresponsible: calling the stock market rigged or rigging the stock market?”: Michael Lewis speaks at LSE


“Increments of time that it’s hard to imagine being valuable – but they’re very valuable.” This is how Michael Lewis characterises the degree to which Franklin’s old saw that ‘time is money’ has become exacerbated to degrees far beyond the venerable ‘first’ American’s imaginings. 

Lewis talks of 0.25 microseconds, the degree to which the New York Stock Exchange lags behind the high speed exchanges which line the New Jersey turnpike, as “laughably slow”. By way of comparison, the author of Liar’s Poker, Moneyball, The Big Short, and now Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt, explains that one of his own sneezes takes about 100 microseconds – “and I’m a pretty fast sneezer.”

As a result of this inexcusable tardiness, the New York Stock Exchange is now, Lewis claims, little more than “a backdrop for CNBC TV shows … a stage set,” while all the real action is taking place in “fortress-like places” in the suburbs, heavily guarded, deliberately opaque, and stuffed to the gills with high-octane processing power. Indeed, every aspect of the way actual finance actually works in the new virtual economy is, Lewis claims, kept as deliberately impenetrable as the buildings in which it operates.

Not that he particularly wants to change this admittedly “poisoned” system. “I am inside the system,” the ex-Salomon Brothers broker admits. While Occupy and others hoping for a better world are merely “clamouring inchoately” at the fortress walls with “no plausible ideology to flee to.”

And yet what sticks in my mind from Lewis’s talk on monday at the Peacock Theatre of his old alma mater is what may at first seem a trivial sequence of events in the life of Brad Katsuyama, the “nice guy” from the Royal Bank of Canada who first noticed that between the moment he clicked buy on his computer terminal in Toronto and the actual moment of purchase, someone was intervening; jumping the queue, buying his shares first and selling them back to him at a higher price than he ordered.

First of all, Lewis tells us, Katsuyama thought there was a problem with his computer. He slapped the side of his monitor. Rebooted the system. No dice.

Then, when he called up technical support, they told him it was his fault. In fact, as Lewis tells it, they repeatedly laid down on him all the many different ways that this problem was his own fault.

Finally, having realised what the problem actually was, Katsuyama set about explaining it to other big investors. None of whom knew about it already. But some had noticed there was a problem. One thought he had a leak in his own house, an insider trading ripping him off from his own office.

There’s something familiar about this, a kind of blueprint for capitalism’s habitual response to exposures of its own systemic failures.

Firstly, there’s a technical problem. Just a technicality. It can be fixed by a matter of engineering, more computing power…

Secondly, the problem is yours. You have made a mistake or have some defect in your character. Perhaps you should see a shrink or try these pills…

And Thirdly, there may be a few bad apples. Perhaps one or two corrupt individuals within the system. We’ll weed them out, see them punished, carry on as normal…

But the system itself? Oh, that’s fine…

Wednesday, 30 April 2014

Piano Smashing: A Brief History



1. Franz Liszt (1811—1886)

“Beethoven’s piano famously spewed broken strings out of its case in his more ferocious moments, but Liszt apparently broke the cases themselves. After one of his opera paraphrases the heaving, trembling instrument would be at his feet, utterly spent, and a new one would have to be carried out on to the stage from the wings. Those early, wooden-framed pianos simply could not cope with playing which now flowed in energy and force from shoulder and back, rather than merely with the earlier wrist and forearm technique of a Hummel or a Czerny.”

– from Stephen Hough, ‘Liszt: The Man Who Broke Pianos’


2. Alberto Savinio (1891—1952)

“Savinio’s performance techniques included smashing the piano with his fists and dragging a board up and down the keys. The results were predictable but exciting. After one concert André Billy recalls hearing Apollinaire exclaim: ‘He broke the piano! Now that’s what I call a musician!’ In a written review of the same concert, Apollinaire goes further: ‘I believe that within two years he will have broken all the pianos existing in Paris, after which he might leave to traverse the world and break all the pianos existing in the universe. This will perhaps be a good riddance.’”

– from Christopher Schiff, ‘Banging on the Windowpane: Sound in Early Surrealism


3. Jerry Lee Lewis (1935+)

“He had the crowd screaming and rushing the stage, and when it seemed that the screams had grown loudest and the rushing most chaotic, he stood, licked the piano stool away with violence, and broke into ‘Great Balls of Fire’. As the screaming chaos grew suddenly and sublimely greater, he drew from his jacket a Coke bottle full of gasoline, and he doused the piano with one hand as the other banged out the song; and he struck a wooden match and he set the piano aflame, and his hands, like the hands of a madman, did not quit the blazing keys, but kept pounding, until all became unknown tongues and holiness and fire, and the kids went utterly, magically berserk with the frenzy of it all … ”

– from Nick Tosches, Hellfire: The Jerry Lee Lewis Story


4. Piano Smashing Contests (UK, 1950s–60s)

“It was a strange time to start learning the piano. In the 1950s, when I was a boy, it was the fashion in England to hold piano smashing competitions. Because television had arrived. The piano in the front parlor in most houses became suddenly redundant. And there was little or no demand for secondhand pianos. So all around the country, at school fêtes and country fairs, an orgy of piano smashing broke out. On village greens, on football pitches, teams of men with sledge hammers, axes, hacksaws and crowbars attacked upright pianos and reduced them to debris that had to pass through a hoop about two inches in diameter, to verify that the destruction was whole-hearted and thorough.”

“I witnessed a piano-smashing only once. I was shocked by it. To see two teams of grown men wantonly laying in to two defenceless uprights, to see felted hammers flying everywhere, tangles of springy piano wire, splintered wood and the black and white ivories lying slaughtered on the green grass. Now, years later, I think that it was possibly also a symbolic act, the ritual destruction of repressive Victorian values, embodied in the piano, which deserved to be taken out on to the village green by right-thinking English yeomen and smashed. Decades of primness, prudery and piety in the parlor, of hypocrisy and violence, of empire, wars and colonialism. All this projected on to the piano, around which families prayed and sang hymns and parlor songs of fervent faith and patriotism. But the craft that went into an upright piano! All gone in a twinkling. And a tinkling. How very sad it was.”

– from Anthony Marshall, ‘Still Life with Goanna?


“Some time in the mid 1960s, by which time I’d been doing my head in the piano thing for a few years, I saw a feature on telly about people smashing up a piano with sledgehammers. It not only looked fantastic, it also sounded like nothing I had ever heard before. What I wanted to do was get a sledgehammer and smash up our piano just to hear those sounds at close quarters for myself.”

“At that time the country was full of old pianos that nobody could play anymore. They were all left over from a time before radios and record players, when people had to make their own music. To be able to play the piano was a social skill that many a young man aspired to. Every pub had one. But you know that, you’ve seen enough old films. There was another problem for these old pianos. Central heating. When it came in for the masses in the 1960s. central heating completely fucked these pianos. Buckled their frames, made them impossible to keep in tune.”

“After this one showing of a piano being smashed on telly, piano smashing swept the country. No village fete was complete without a piano smashing contest. Soon all the pianos available for smashing in the country had been smashed. So piano-smashing faded from the place it held for a few years in the public imagination and popular culture. Except I kept dreaming of smashing our piano.”

– from Bill Drummond, The 17


5. ‘Piano Activities’ by Philip Corner (as performed at the Wiesbaden Fluxus Festival, 1962)

“In Philip Corner’s Piano Activities, performed in 1962 at the first Fluxus-titled festival in Wiesbaden, Germany, Dick Higgins, George Maciunas, Alison Knowles, and Emmett Williams engaged in the apparent destruction of an old, unplayable piano belonging to the Kunstverein. They did destroy the instrument, but not haphazardly … the careful rubbing of a brick over the strings, the patient waiting for the right moment to use a hammer.” 

– from Hannah Higgins, Fluxus Experience

“The work was not originally intended to include the destruction of the instrument, although in this performance the activities were interpreted as such and the piano was taken apart violently with crowbars, saws, and hammers. Corner was against any wanton destruction, but when informed that the parts had been turned into sculptures he understood that the piano had been positively transformed by its breakdown.”



6. Annea Lockwood (1939+)

“Set upright piano (not a grand) in an open space with the lid closed.

Spill a little lighter fluid on a twist of paper and place inside, near the pedals.

 Light it.

 Balloons may be stapled to the piano.

 Play whatever pleases you for as long as you can.”

– score to ‘Piano Burning’ (1968)


Monday, 28 April 2014

Everybody Was Doing It And We Didn’t Know What It Was



"You know, when I first started out, I was working as a sculptor with a lot of different kinds of people. This was New York in the 70s. There were like sculptors, painters, musicians… And at one point we were all working on operas.”

“We called them that. They were just big events with lots of stuff. And somehow the voice would be threading through it – and that was it.”

“It was weird. You would be walking down the street and go, how’s your opera? Mine’s fine, how’s yours? Everybody was doing it and we didn’t know what it was.”

“So, I like the word opera. It just means a big kind of thing. Often featuring the voice – maybe not bel canto.”

— Laurie Anderson (from an interview for The Quietus)

Sunday, 20 April 2014

Sounds Are Like People: works by Morton Feldman and Heiner Goebbels at MAC, Lyon


“It’s a funny story, actually – ” A portly, bespectacled New Yorker in his late fifties is addressing a bemused crowd in Frankfurt. It’s 1984. The title of the talk is ‘The Future of Local Music’ but it’s a title the man on stage is barely even paying lip service to. 

“Stockhausen asked for my secret. ‘What’s your secret?’ And I said, ‘I don’t have a secret, but if I do have a point of view, it’s that sounds are very much like people. And if you push them, they push you back. So, if I have a secret: don’t push the sounds around.’ Karlheinz leans over to me and says: ‘Not even a little bit?’” 

“I’m not like Stockhausen,” Morton Feldman insisted that day in Frankfurt, “I’m not creating music, it’s already there … ” Feldman’s not-being-like Stockhausen is one of the perennial themes of the now-famous Frankfurt lecture. “What really makes a composer distinguishable from another composer,” he says later, “is one’s orchestration,” – before adding, “ – except for Stockhausen…” 

This un-Stockhausen-ness of the great Brooklynite composer is illustrated by a diagram sketched on an A4 sheet, one of thirty recently acquired by the Musée d’Art Contemporain in Lyon, in which we find two columns headed up ‘Stockhausen’ and ‘Feldman’. In between the two we read down the parameters ‘Logic’, ‘Continuity’, ‘Climax’, ‘Tension’, and so on. Beside each of these traditional musical values – twelve in all – there’s a little tick in the column marked ‘Stockhausen’ and a little cross in the other.


Feldman’s felt-tipped notes from that Frankfurt lecture, spread across the walls of the MAC for the exhibition Listen Profoundly (which finishes today), show a sprawling and erratic sensibility. Skewed underlinings, crossings out, scarcely legible scribblings and multiple exclamation points abound in a selection of scribblings that resemble the exact opposite of the Powerpoint presentation your colleague gave at the lunchtime meeting the other day. 

We find strange diagrams with an oblong grid here, a few marked pizzicato there, dots, staves, the word ‘JERK’ in block capitals. They resemble impromptu scores as much as lecture notes – and maybe they are. This is a composer, after all, for whom sounds themselves seem just “intuitively to do things” and ideas are like “children … yearning for attention.”

It’s all about orchestration, he insists. That, and listening. “One of the problems about functional harmony is that it hears for us, see,” Feldman says. “We no longer have to hear. We are the found object, you see, where it’s listening for us. Harmony is like going to a public accountant to do certain work.”

“Listen profoundly” Feldman wrote on one of his A4 sheets, with a circle and a square below. The shapes recall the windows of the main hall in the Genko-an temple in Kyoto. “There are two differently shaped windows with views to the same garden,” Heiner Goebbels explains in the notes accompanying the exhibition, “a square window – the ‘window of confusion’ – and a round window – the ‘window of enlightenment’. More than twenty years ago I could encounter these two perspectives on a concert tour through Japan and in 2008 I started a series of installations freely adapting this experience.”


Genko-an 69006 (2014) takes us into a blackened room divided by a pillar. Taking a seat on a bench at the back of the room, we are presented with a choice: sit one side of the pillar and face a large square in neon, sit the other side, and you will face a neon circle. Everything else is blackness and – thanks to the pillar – there isn’t anyway of sitting such that you can see both.

Out of the darkness come voices, some familiar, some strange. Each voice – Alvin Lucier reading the instructions to I Am Sitting in a Room, Gertrude Stein reading from The Making of Americans, Marina Abramovic and Ulay assuring us repeatedly that “everything will be alright”, and a whole host of ethnographic recordings from around the world – comes and goes, scarcely overlapping or crowding each out. None of the sounds are being pushed around here. Feldman, doubtless, would approve.

The bright neon lights of the circle and the square seemed to me to tremble a little or to fluctuate in intensity from time to time but I was never sure whether this was simply an effect of staring at them for so long. I spent some time in this darkened room, watching and staring at these shapes, facing sometimes the circle, sometimes the square, sometimes trying – and failing – to see both at once. But I couldn’t honestly say that I felt more enlightened looking at the one or more confused looking at the other.

I could certainly say that I enjoyed my time in Goebbels’s ‘garden’. Having spent the previous hours, before arriving at the museum, soaking up the botanic gardens next door, I found these acoustic ‘flowers’ as perfectly placed, as harmoniously balanced, as those releasing their perfumes outside.


Wednesday, 16 April 2014

Criticism By Other Means


I have two short pieces (on George Dyson’s Turing’s Cathedral and Jonathan Sterne’s MP3: The Meaning of a Format) in this new collection from Review 31, coming out soon from Zero Books

The book, which will be published in June, also features writing by Nina Power, Benjamin Noys, Ian Birchall, Gee Williams, Dan Barrow, Hugh Foley, and many other fine people. It is available to pre-order now from The Book Depository or Amazon (10% cheaper at the former).

Thursday, 10 April 2014

Present Fictions


“All these are really great,” she said, shuffling through powerpoint slides depicting babies with gills, oil sheikhs practising terraforming in a luminous sandbox, a teeming rainforest populated by genetically engineered creepy crawlies. “Really interesting.” None of this stuff is real. At least, not quite. They are design fictions, speculative forays upon the product cycles of other worlds: a futurism of things. 

A 99¢ store on Flatbush Avenue in downtown Brooklyn holds a one-off sale on the inexpensive household goods of tomorrow: deuterium filters, personal air cylinders, degrees while you sleep. Giant energy-harvesting mushrooms stolen from a Dutch biotech lab flourish amongst the highrise blocks of a Mumbai slum. Nano-waste like bionic enhancers and optical metamaterials are traded and harvested in the aftermath of a World Expo in the Democratic Republic of Congo in the year 2020. 

But despite these fantastical scenarios, “science fiction,” we are told, “is not as intrinsically embedded in design fiction as some people think.” 

The speaker, wide-eyed and infectiously ebullient, is Cher Potter, resident forecaster at the Victoria and Albert Museum and a former director at fashion industry trend spotters WGSN. Potter is “definitely not interested in utopias”. Nor does she have much time for “trying to create betters in the world.” What she is interested in is ideas – especially ideas of the sort easily expressible in glossy images and a few lines of text. These she breezes through as though absent-mindedly scrolling through Tumblrs. What does it all mean? What are the implications of this stuff? What’s it trying to say about the world? Who cares? Doesn’t matter. No time. Everything is “great”. Everything is “really interesting.” 

But Cher Potter, and the industry she is an exponent of, are on the up. “Forecasting,” she tells us, “is one of the fastest growing industries in the UK at the moment.” A broadly-framed ‘speculative practice’, taking in everyone from radical artists and theorists to corporate trend spotters and government-backed predictive analysts, is here constituted as a single “emergent discipline”. As artist and film-maker Gareth Owen Lloyd, director of Peckham’s Food Face art space, prods from his seat in the audience: Would Potter forecast a coming trend for the forecasting of trends? When she looks ahead in time, does she see more and more people looking further and further ahead? 

Potter demurs at the question; apprehensive, perhaps, of its gordian implications. But the query is indicative of the kind of entanglements that arise when the language of marketing and promotions gets into bed with the respective blue-sky spiels of think tanks and exhibition curators. The future is so hot right now – and even more so, in the future.


Friday, 4 April 2014

The Blue Goo Cometh: Patrick Furness at Food Face, Peckham


Via Facebook

Patrick Furness’s live intervention at the Food Face artspace presents itself like a freeze frame from a science fiction film which the viewer is invited to step into and wander about. A trail of viscous blue goo leads from the loosely-curtained entrance into the gallery space. Following this stream of azure slime through Food Face’s angular confines, we discover the artist himself, lying on his back in a full-body puffa suit, covered from neck to toe in this same sludgy substance. 

From his feet, the goo extends further, ending in a puddle beneath a vertical bank of five TV monitors – like those used by a film director on set. Bar the occasional flicker, each monitor displays a static frame of the same blue monochrome. 

It’s almost as if our protagonist was surprised, while watching Derek Jarman’s Blue, to find the colour leaking out of the screen, overcoming and engulfing him, pinning him down to the floor. But absent are the voices of Jarman and his co-narrators; instead we hear waves of electronic sound flowing from concealed speakers. Resonant synth pads cycle through a loop of a dozen-odd unequally-lengthed chords (a twelve-bar blues?), alternately bright with subdued technological optimism and seething with barely suppressed foreboding. 



It was as a sound artist – albeit of a peculiarly playful sort – that I first encountered Furness. At the Royal Festival Hall in 2010, Furness covered the Clore Ballroom in boards of MDF and laminated them with 7.9km of magnetic audio tape. Visitors were invited to drive remote controlled cars with playback heads under their chassis over the tape race tracks, picking up the electronic sounds recorded thereon as they went. Around the same time, his band Nine Owls in a Baguette performed with extravagant costumes and homemade synthesizers at a little cabaret evening I used to put on at a jazz club in Greenwich.

Several years later, and Furness is now focusing (so Food Face’s press release tells me) on “humour, conspiracy, and his place in the universe.” The present show, R- - -Retrograde reflects his “ongoing research around cosmology” with an oblique look at retrograde motions and inverse evolutions.

There is a pervading sense of excess about the piece – why five screens? Why so much goop? Like the old biotech spook story of grey goo overtaking the planet, we seem to be witnessing someone literally flattened and surrendered by a massive superfluity of information, of mucilaginous media flow, or of aesthetics, even. Think of modern art’s long love affair with the cerulean, from Picasso to Barnett Newman.  He could have been bludgeoned to the floor by art itself, like an Yves Klein happening gone horribly wrong.



But there has been another, rather more practical use of ultramarine gunk recently. Over the last few years hazardous materials crews in Japan have been liberally applying a gelatinous blue goo in and around the exclusion zone surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Apparently this stuff, called DeconGel, can clean up anything – dirt, toxic contaminants, radiation, you name it – and then just peels off like a latex skin. 

In true comic-book-super-hero-origin-story style, the stuff was only discovered after an accident in a chemistry lab, but with 72 new nuclear reactors currently under construction (according to the IAEA), and weird weather on the rise globally raising the spectre of more uncontrollable and unforeseeable accidents, perhaps this strange blue goo will become an increasingly common sight in cities and rural areas around the world. Patrick Furness’s Retrograde, then, becomes less a step back, more a look ahead.